Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment
Digital Document
Content type |
Content type
|
---|---|
Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
Genre |
Genre
|
Origin Information |
|
---|
Persons |
Author (aut): Joee Munn
|
---|
Abstract |
Abstract
The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of the most infamous psychology experiments and is frequently mentioned in textbooks. Conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo, the SPE aimed to explore and understand how individuals conform when given orders by an authority figure, as well as to demonstrate how being given power can lead to abuse. However, the experiment was riddled with methodological flaws and has been debunked by many modern researchers and psychologists. Despite this, the SPE continues to captivate the public and is often cited as evidence that ordinary, good people can commit harmful and violent acts when placed in positions of power. Nevertheless, due to its deeply flawed methodology and numerous ethical violations, it can be argued that the primary lesson of the SPE is not about human behavior but about what not to do in psychological research. |
---|---|
Language |
Language
|
Department |
Department
|
---|---|
Institution |
Institution
|
Publication Title |
Publication Title
|
---|
First page number |
First page number
50
|
---|---|
Last page number |
Last page number
54
|
Digital Origin |
Digital Origin
born digital
|
Related Item |
Related Item
|
---|
ISSN |
ISSN
2562-5624
|
---|
Rights Statement |
Rights Statement
|
---|---|
Use License |
Keywords |
Keywords
Experimental Ethics
Experimental Psychology
Roles
Authority
|
---|
594-Extracted Text.txt14.23 KB
594-Thumbnail Image.png39.25 KB
Cite this
Language |
English
|
---|---|
Name |
Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment
|
MIME type |
application/pdf
|
File size |
174737
|
Media Use | |
Authored by | |
Authored on |
|
Download
Document